arviz_stats.compare

Contents

arviz_stats.compare#

arviz_stats.compare(compare_dict, method='stacking', var_name=None)[source]#

Compare models based on their expected log pointwise predictive density (ELPD).

The ELPD is estimated by Pareto smoothed importance sampling leave-one-out cross-validation, the same method used by func:arviz_stats.loo. The method is described in [1] and [2]. By default, the weights are estimated using "stacking" as described in [3].

Parameters:
compare_dict: dict of {str: DataTree or ELPDData}

A dictionary of model names and xr.DataTree or ELPDData.

method: str, optional

Method used to estimate the weights for each model. Available options are:

  • ‘stacking’ : stacking of predictive distributions.

  • ‘BB-pseudo-BMA’ : pseudo-Bayesian Model averaging using Akaike-type weighting. The weights are stabilized using the Bayesian bootstrap.

  • ‘pseudo-BMA’: pseudo-Bayesian Model averaging using Akaike-type weighting, without Bootstrap stabilization (not recommended).

For more information read https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02030

var_name: str, optional

If there is more than a single observed variable in the InferenceData, which should be used as the basis for comparison.

Returns:
A DataFrame, ordered from best to worst model (measured by the ELPD).
The index reflects the key with which the models are passed to this function. The columns are:
rank: The rank-order of the models. 0 is the best.
elpd: ELPD estimated either using (PSIS-LOO-CV elpd_loo or WAIC elpd_waic).

Higher ELPD indicates higher out-of-sample predictive fit (“better” model).

pIC: Estimated effective number of parameters.
elpd_diff: The difference in ELPD between two models.

If more than two models are compared, the difference is computed relative to the top-ranked model, that always has a elpd_diff of 0.

weight: Relative weight for each model.

This can be loosely interpreted as the probability of each model (among the compared model) given the data. By default the uncertainty in the weights estimation is considered using Bayesian bootstrap.

SE: Standard error of the ELPD estimate.

If method = BB-pseudo-BMA these values are estimated using Bayesian bootstrap.

dSE: Standard error of the difference in ELPD between each model and the top-ranked model.

It’s always 0 for the top-ranked model.

warning: A value of 1 indicates that the computation of the ELPD may not be reliable.

This could be indication of WAIC/LOO starting to fail see http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.04544 for details.

See also

loo

Compute the ELPD using the Pareto smoothed importance sampling Leave-one-out cross-validation method.

arviz_plots.plot_compare

Summary plot for model comparison.

References

[1]

Vehtari et al. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistics and Computing. 27(5) (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.04544.

[2]

Vehtari et al. Pareto Smoothed Importance Sampling. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25(72) (2024) https://jmlr.org/papers/v25/19-556.html arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02646

[3]

Yao et al. Using stacking to average Bayesian predictive distributions Bayesian Analysis, 13, 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1214/17-BA1091 arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02030.

Examples

Compare the centered and non centered models of the eight school problem:

In [1]: In [1]: from arviz_stats import compare
   ...:    ...: from arviz_base import load_arviz_data
   ...:    ...: data1 = load_arviz_data("non_centered_eight")
   ...:    ...: data2 = load_arviz_data("centered_eight")
   ...:    ...: compare_dict = {"non centered": data1, "centered": data2}
   ...:    ...: compare(compare_dict)
   ...: 
Out[1]: 
              rank       elpd         p  ...        se       dse  warning
non centered     0 -30.716361  0.902646  ...  1.333201  0.000000     True
centered         1 -30.781004  0.945475  ...  1.347355  0.061164    False

[2 rows x 8 columns]